![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TTORA Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cuyamaca CA/N.Las Vegas NV
Posts: 598
|
See post in Landcruiser section also. Could it be that the new diesel V8 we've been hearing about will be this one?
<4.4 V8 twin turbo intercooled CRD diesel (300 HP, 428ft.lbs. torque)> Sounds good, where do I sign up?
__________________
2000 UZJ100 Land Cruiser TLCA #14734 Blue Ribbon Coalition #36400 Calamaridog
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
03 Taco 4x4 ext cab, 2.7, 5 spd, 2.5" toytec spacer lift, 1.5" AAL, 265/75R16 Pro Comp MT's on sweet ass Moto Metal rims, BBP rock sliders, Stull billet grill, AFE Intake, SS Magnaflow muffler, loud ass system and a cool ass BBP Mag light holder. 94 Trackick, under the knife. 1.6L, AT, 33" Truxxus MT's, dual cases, toy axles, stretched WB, some armor and a cage someday. Oh, and chopped half the body off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anchorage Ak or Vancouver Wa.
Posts: 503
|
Quote:
Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
I LIVE FOR THIS
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 TACOMA 3.4L 102K AND COUNTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
I LIVE FOR THIS
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 TACOMA 3.4L 102K AND COUNTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
...Or maybe they wanted to leave the fun up to the consumers . Truck owners will start sounding like mk4 supra owners, talking about going single, putting down big power, and smoking chevy's and ford's .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
I LIVE FOR THIS
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 TACOMA 3.4L 102K AND COUNTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
...the engine numbers as far as BHP and BTQ are peak numbers and not useful numbers to compare domestic trucks to foreign trucks diesels (Like the V10 diesel in the VW Tourage) than the numbers thru out the RPM range...the use and drivability in the diesel engine design are totally different animals... I have always heard Toyota built Diesels are some of the best engineered around...I remember reading the Isusu Duramax ( now GM Duramax) was adapted from an old school Toyota Marine Diesel design...but I definitely haven't kept on top of all their developments since there is likely nothing coming state side until the Diesel fuel sulfur content goes down and emissions standards change! http://www.toyota-europe.com/technol...ines/dcat.html the BMW Mini Cooper has used Toyota built diesel engines like this over in the European market! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cuyamaca CA/N.Las Vegas NV
Posts: 598
|
I don't know what to tell you. It's not just about "rated" numbers. A good engine/transmission package makes all the difference and reliability is #1.
I'm sure they will produce a competative product...
__________________
2000 UZJ100 Land Cruiser TLCA #14734 Blue Ribbon Coalition #36400 Calamaridog
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
428 lb-ft.
whatcha gonna do with that? play in the sand box? get a real diesel. my 2005 CTD has 325 HP and 610 lb-ft. that is a real motor. i could bomb it and really get some huge numbers. with 428 lb-ft, toyota will never break into the big truck market.
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_53495/newsarticle.html You know Ford is the market leader in U.S. passenger "Big truck" sales and that didn't stop Toyota from overtaking them in total vehicle sales!!! Toyota has plans for a Hybrid electric for the Tundra when the new San Antonio plant comes in to service... the rumor is that the electric engines will carry 1000 lb ft torque ratings and that is thru out the RPM range 0-what ever RPM, not peak like your punny 610 lb ft Cummings ...where the hell can you find real driving conditions where you actually get the RPM up high enough for that motor to generate 610 lb ft...you don't!! Don't get me wrong domestic turbo diesels (even though Cummings and Duramax are not domestic) are good trucks...but there are better things on the horizon!! http://www.atsdiesel.com/ BTW ATS performance diesel is local to me...you want to see what a performance diesel does to a drive train watch them blow stuff up at Bandimeer speed way...they can make 700+ hp and 1300 lb ft and they get it down to the ground better than any other performance diesel company but they sure go thru a lot of drive train parts! That will be Toyotas limitation creating reliable drive trains for all the torque they will be producing! if you play with numbers you better be good at math!! comparing peak engine TQ and HP numbers is about as useful as comparing knife blade lengths on a butter knife...bigger is not always better! PS I am not attacking you...just pushing home a point! maybe a little too hard! Last edited by bluetaco; 02-20-2005 at 05:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 32
|
It seems some are jumping to conclusion too soon. Some are comparing this diesel to larger 3/4ton-1ton truck diesels. For all we know this new diesel may only be for the 1/2ton tundra, if it is it easily outclasses the competition. Don't forget the 400hp+ 700lbtq+ diesel mentioned some months ago, that could be the diesel that'll be in the 3/4ton-1ton tundra. Everytime a toyota truck comes out with class leading whatever, many are quick to compare it to other larger(3/4-1ton) and not even in the same class trucks. The tundra is a 1/2ton truck when it was introduced and see how many domestic owners were quick to claim their 3/4ton or 1ton can do better. We're still waiting on some word about the 3/4-1ton tundra, until then this looks like a 1/2ton tundra diesel. Think about it, this same diesel is gonna be in the landcruiser and sequoia too. Those two SUV are 1/2ton class. I'm sure the 3/4-1ton will have a larger more powerful diesel.
__________________
Need More Power |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
and what good does an overseas toyota do me unless i want to move overseas? have you ever seen the torque curve as to when it hits 610 lb-ft? obviously not. it is flat from about 1600-2900. i bet i'll have a really hard time getting to 1600 rpm.
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 168
|
Also power to weight ratio comes in. Rams,250-350's, and 2500 hd's are beast. they got to weigh close to 7-8k?
__________________
Chris GA 2001 Tacoma 2.7 5spd 2 1/2 Suspension lift 285/75/16 BFG A/T |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
hardcore dude
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 1,039
|
Yeah, they probably weigh around that.
Lets see, a little more torque to displacement ratios... -4.4 Toyota @ 428lb/ft = 9.727lb/ft or torque per 100cc's. -5.9 Cummins @ 600lb/ft = 10.169lb/ft of torque per 100cc's. Considering Toyota isn't as dedicated to diesels as Cummins is, it isn't that bad. And isn't the Ford Power Stroke like 6.7l or something and not even the torque of the Cummins? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
the issue is not power to weight or power to cc. to compete in this market, you need to have well over 300 HP and nothing under 600 lb-ft of torque anymore. that is just where the market has gone. it needs to haul 15000 pounds, etc. i am sure the toyota will be a great truck (i have two and wished toyota had somethign to compete with my CTD), but if what you need is a serious 3/4 or 1 ton towing beast then it needs to be heavy and be able to move houses. even the Hino diesel has to be something 8 liters to get anywhere near the right power. it will indeed be interesting to see where toyota takes this. they need a solid axle rig with front coils, and a full floating rear with at least a 10.50" ring gear.
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Big tars, little bed.
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
5th Annual Southeast TTORA Takeover Info My Truck and Specs BRC since 2006www.sharetrails.org TLCA #15854 www.tlca.org SFWDA since 2005 www.sfwda.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
As far as 1/2 ton trucks are concerned, I don't see anything around that compares with Toyota's numbers. The Titan and Dodge Ram 1500 make more horsepower, with more cubic inches, but the torque isn't even close. Nor does the F-150 nor the Chev/GMC 1500 come close. Toyota has them beat, with a smaller engine to boot. With a diesel, fuel efficiency will be better too. What can you say? This Tundra sounds like an excellent 1/2 ton truck to me.
__________________
-Brock NormalAmerican The Land of the Free, Because of the Brave! ![]() Last edited by Bnorm; 02-22-2005 at 01:09 PM. Reason: Grammar, as usual. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 14
|
ford deisels are ok cummins is the power house of them all try gettin 22 on the high way wiht a ford 4x4 deisel the cummins is also the most reliable and most backed by company then the 3 my aunt got her ford just 1 month after my dad got his cummins,(she was jealous) the next step they took was the six gun pack from banks both trucks have it and both have the speed loader and basically the Identical kit, the dodge is a stick the PS is a auto. when going to the norco horse show my dad had a 6,000 pound trailer with 4 horses and my aunt had a 5,000 pound horse trialer/camper with 2 horses, going up cohone pass my dad threw it in the 6 upgrade setting and hit the gas and left it in 5th gear and went up the hill at 2,000 rpms at 65 mph my aunt threw hers in 6th setting hit the gas and couldnt pull that figure. iam not dissing ford but with such big diesels they should have the power readins alittle higher. anyways back to the 4.4 i dont think toyota is going for some BRUTE FORCE ride i think they are going reliable and mpg with a suv like that and the engine i would like to see 20 in town and mayb 23-24 on highway, it would also be a great trail vehicle becuase of the torque at low rpms and reliablity deisels are known to hit 500,000 wiht out engine rebuild my 22RE has 239,003 and is on orignal tranny and engine so who knows how far that will go. i also agree the twin turbo is prolly for how smallt he displacement is it can turn two small turbos better then one big turbo also more torquew
adam |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
you can spout factory figures all you want...I'm sure that imaginary 610 lb ft is more than enough to haul what even trailer you need it to pull and you are perfectly happy with the truck you are paying for... ...but I know about million other trucks with smaller imaginary numbers in comparison that will do every thing yours does and then some ! read some of the other posts in this thread...maybe you should spend less money on that "610 lb ft" turbo diesel and more on buying a clue! But you know if you are willing to spend more money you are bound to win something... like the emptiest pockets award! what does 610 lb ft torque translate to? Real world...would the difference between ~482lb ft and ~610 lb ft keep me from hauling, well most anything you can legally or reasonably haul with a passenger class vehicle! answer is no!! But don't worry the majority of consumers follow the same line of thought you do so maybe that 1000 lb ft rating Toyota potentially has on the horizon might translate to real world dollars for them and a shinny big pockets award! keep rolling those eyes eventually they will uncross and you can see straight!
Last edited by bluetaco; 02-22-2005 at 04:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
300 HP 600 lb ft, haul 15000lbs... I know of no less that a hundred cases of owners of heavy duty trucks and only know about a dozen that ever haul 15000lbs trailers...the tax cut you get from owning a large truck or SUV was a greater consideration than the actual performance numbers! Toyota might have had a greater stake in that market if they could import their diesel trucks with out such hugh tariffs...and import cost...Isuzu was in the same boat...and the Duramax engine they created would have had a different home then at GM potentially! Toyota does market research better than anyone at the moment..they are very close to being more profitable than even GM... usually what they bring to the table is not to dominate the market but take a piece of the market... You know the single rail injection that Cummins is using on the new engine in your truck is a technology Toyota has had in use for a longer period of time...they just can't/couldn't bring it to the US in a timely manor because of business limitations...competitive advantage is not in their favor nor does their market research show that it is a future market to be in I am venturing to say! smaller Diesel engines are more in line with the future needs of the country...hardly anyone drives a heavy duty truck for daily use...but there will be a potential market for daily driven diesels as biodiesel and other alternative fuel technologies emerge that will create a market Toyota can take advantage of! Last edited by bluetaco; 02-22-2005 at 04:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Terrace,B.C,Canada
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
325 hp and 610 ft lbs of torque thats not power thats a chevy duramax. MY old mans 04 dodge has 395hp but 775 ft lbs of torque with CUMMINS POWER, IN-LINE 6, which out performs all chevy duramax V8 and ford power stroke V8 engines.
__________________
96 Taco with 3 inch revtek lift. Custom homemade rear bumper, 3 inch pa bodylift and new 33x13.5r15 Intero LTB's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
stock. i have not bomb'ed mine yet.
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
paper or not, crank or rear wheels. the difference from 482 to 610 is big. you'll be sitting at the bottom of the hill while i pass everybody.
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Big tars, little bed.
![]() |
ford deisels are ok cummins is the power house of them all >
the '98 Cummins we have at work sux. I love all diesels Im just saying our '02 Super Duty out does it big time. I havent had the pleasure of driving the latest model Cummins. How bout a 500hp CAT diesel we have in our motorhomes? Ill see if i can find out the torque #'s.
__________________
5th Annual Southeast TTORA Takeover Info My Truck and Specs BRC since 2006www.sharetrails.org TLCA #15854 www.tlca.org SFWDA since 2005 www.sfwda.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Big tars, little bed.
![]() |
Ok im Guessing its either the Cat C13 or C15 that comes in the Fleetwood American Eagle RV.
W/ the C13 - HP 335 to 525 @ 2100 rpm Torque 1450-1750 lb0ft @ 1200 rpm and the C15 - HP 435 to 625 @ 2100 rpm Torque 1550-2050 lb0ft @ 1200 rpm eat that Cummins. however some of these Amer. Eagle Rv's do come w/ Cummins rather than CATs. I'll get the specs from one of our techs tomorrow as I am off today. link http://www.cattruckengines.com/OHE/index.htm
__________________
5th Annual Southeast TTORA Takeover Info My Truck and Specs BRC since 2006www.sharetrails.org TLCA #15854 www.tlca.org SFWDA since 2005 www.sfwda.org Last edited by GOT COPE?; 02-24-2005 at 02:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
I personally have no need for a large turbo diesel at this time...but have worked at a GM dealer where much of the business at the time where heavy duty new and use passenger and fleet trucks... I have first hand driving experience full spectrum Ford, Dodge and GM, most models and power train combos...I've driven a few other chassis and drive trains combos beyond the old big three as well! My brother currently owns a F350 power stroke ..., My parents currently own a Silverado 3500, 454CU instead of a turbo diesel because dad prefers gasoline for high altitude and cold weather, My dad also has a V10 F550 for his work truck...my extended family is full of Dodge drivers, four CTD and a V10 ...plus those of friends around the race tracks, farms and ranches I visit often! And I assure you none of them, even the 700Hp 1300 lb ft ones, are very far apart in-terms of time it takes for them to get from one place to the other or the loads they haul! BTW I passed a '05 CTD dually on the side of the highway yesterday in the high wind, towing a car hauler trailer with four cars on it on , with smoke coming from the drive train just past the top of a hill...you are either full of crap and truly irresponsible...or haven't towed much if you are passing any one else up a real graded incline, under load on that drivetrain...you to will be on the side of the road after only 40 miles like the dude I just saw!! ...a trailer certainly can't safely take the abuse you imply, it isn't legal, especially a trailer rated for 15K lbs!! 610 lb ft in a diesel sure as hell doesn't stop any faster than 400 some lb ft (exhaust brakes can get the same PSI with either)...but you aren't getting 610 lb ft and it really doesn't feel any different because of gearing...I can gear a Taco to put down 610 lb ft of torque at 1200 RPM but why? you sound like you have more torque than brains in the way you brag about your truck, if this is the case... FYI your transmission can't take the stress and soon following nether can that small displacement engine!! Big displacement turbo diesel engines with lower relative power, under lower boost and steadier compression cycles... tend to last longer!!! ...the Cummins equipped dodge diesel drive train tend to go away quick if used and abused regularly (my brother worked in service at Dodge for a while why he was away from Toyota.)...why is it that I rarely see any one that relys on a Turbo Diesel to haul large loads on a regular basis keep or own one? Just because you bought one doesn't mean you know what you are doing!! I listen to people that know and do drive them every day...and people that modify them for a living...even if I qualify for an armchair quarterback...I am still better informed about what is going on than the sideline quarterback... especially one that hasn't see much playing time! So, what class hitch did that truck come with? what type and size trailer are you hauling? how far are you hauling and under what conditions? ...I am sure it is fun for you to step on the gas in your truck...force inducted engines usually are! just not on the way from at the gas station!! So if Toyota can bring a Hybrid with 1000 lb ft direct drive electric motors... you will realize that 610lb ft with gobs of friction loss feels a lot closer to 428 lb ft... ...you know trains have diesel engines ...but they are used as power sources for generators making wattage for the electric motors that drive the wheels actually pulling/pushing the load!! http://travel.howstuffworks.com/diesel-locomotive.htm Sounds like Toyota might have something!! Last edited by bluetaco; 02-24-2005 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 831
|
Sorry all, If I had pictures or a digital camara right now that would have been a lot shorter...LOL!!!
![]() just had a bunch on my mind that had to be said! Last edited by bluetaco; 02-24-2005 at 07:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
__________________
1995 T-100 : SAS and all that stuff 1988 4runner : DD 2005 CTD 4x4 : Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panhandle Florida (Fort Walton Beach)
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
http://www-5.dodge.com/vehsuite/Vehi...u&adid=u&rid=u |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|